May 6th, 2008
SNEWS® View: BPA reaction driven by the power of consumer perception, right or wrong
(In Partnership with SNEWS, Grassroots brings you a comprehensive look at the Controversial BPA Debate)
Since SNEWS® first addressed the issue of BPA leeching into water in a Nov. 12, 2003, story, “Sierra magazine story causes stir over Lexan safety” (click here to read), the curiosity and mild concern over possible human health impacts has turned into a feeding frenzy whipped up by government and media reports and devoured by consumers. On Dec. 6, 2007, Canadian retailer MEC announced that it was pulling all polycarbonate bottles from its shelves “until guidance is provided by the government of Canada on the health risks posed by BPA.” (Click here to read the SNEWS® story.)
The irony in all of this is that we are collectively experiencing far more exposure to BPA through the lining of canned goods than from any water bottle we’ve ever used. Every can on every kitchen shelf is likely lined with a coating that contains BPA. Yes, the canned food industry is now scrambling to find alternatives too, but no one is suffering quite the brunt of scorn and media ridicule as Nalgene. The company was an easy and, as we’ve stated, unfair target. But, that’s now moot. By this time next year, we expect that polycarbonate bottles and containers still in the retail pipeline will have been depleted, replaced instead with alternatives, including the new Eastman product Tritan. Of course, who knows if some scientist down the road will not find something bad about Tritan, too. Only time will tell, but let’s hope for the best.
Please read the full article by the SNEWS Staff here
To read other articles and resources provided by Grassroots Manufacturers on BPA please go here.






